Michael Blank

Michael Blank

Assistant Professor
Stanford GSB

blankm@stanford.edu

I am an Assistant Professor of Finance at the Stanford Graduate School of Business. Prior to joining Stanford, I graduated from Harvard with a PhD in Business Economics.
 
You can find my CV here.
 
 

Working papers

Credit Cycles, Firms, and the Labor Market
With Omeed Maghzian
Abstract We use administrative data from the U.S. Census Bureau to estimate the causal effects of loose credit conditions on firm employment and worker earnings. To obtain random variation in which firms experience reduced credit spreads during booms, we exploit the segmentation of high-yield (BB+ rated) versus investment grade (BBB- rated) firms in credit markets. Loose credit conditions causally generate a boom-bust cycle in employment: high-default risk firms initially engage in significant job creation, but then experience financial distress and destroy these jobs over the next five years. We show that these boom-bust dynamics are transmitted to workers. To obtain random variation in which workers take the jobs created during booms, we exploit the importance of parental connections in determining where labor market entrants first work. We find that recent high-school graduates with parents at high-yield (BB+) firms can more easily find high-paying jobs during credit booms, compared to graduates with parents at investment-grade (BBB-) firms. But ten years later, graduates with BB+ parents have substantially lower relative earnings. The magnitude of these negative long-term effects is comparable to the effect of entering the labor market during a recession. Overall, our results suggest that loose credit market conditions cause firms to create short-lived jobs that expose workers to aggregate downturns and impede their accumulation of human capital.
| PDF  
  Investor Composition and Overreaction
With Spencer Kwon and Johnny Tang
Abstract How do we predict which asset-price booms go bust? We develop a model of financial markets with investor heterogeneity that yields a summary statistic for the degree to which an asset price overreacts to news: the gap in holdings of the asset by oversensitive investors versus rational investors. We use quarterly institutional holdings data to measure investors’ news sensitivity according to their tendency to purchase stocks after positive news, and compute from this measure the asset-level holdings gaps between oversensitive and rational investors. We find that investor news sensitivity is persistent over time, with the holdings gap measure able to forecast reversals or continuation of asset-price run-ups. Furthermore, the holdings gap measure serves as a powerful aggregator of different channels of overreaction, reflecting not only price extrapolation but also overreaction to various sources of non-price information, such as industry winners and fundamental growth.
| PDF  
 

Work in Progress

The Labor Market Spillovers of Job Destruction
With Omeed Maghzian
Abstract Should policymakers aim to directly prevent job destruction in recessions? The answer depends on the extent to which worker job losses change equilibrium outcomes by congesting the labor market. In a model with search frictions and heterogenous jobs, we show that the externality of a lost job is negative for workers and positive for firms, with the overall magnitude dependent on the speed with which firms replenish lost jobs. We then use administrative microdata to quantify the equilibrium spillover effects of job destruction in the cross-section of U.S. labor markets for 1997-2015. We provide conditions under which we can use the employment decisions of large, national firms to identify labor market spillovers. Workers who lose jobs in labor markets with a one percentage point increase in local job destruction experience a 1.2% reduction of earnings over six years, half of which is a result of lower employment. Our estimates imply that job destruction accounts for about one-fourth of the cyclicality of worker job loss in our sample. We calibrate a job ladder model to our spillover estimates on workers. Our quantitative model implies that using employment subsidies to smooth job destruction following aggregate shocks is welfare-improving.
 
  Financial Acceleration and Employment: A Regional Approach
With Adriano Fernandes
Abstract How do firms shape the transmission of macroeconomic shocks and policy? Financial accelerator theories emphasize the role of firm-level financing frictions in amplifying the macroeconomic impact of aggregate shocks. While this literature generally focuses on capital investment, we consider how the effects of monetary shocks are amplified through links between financing frictions and labor demand. Under financial acceleration, firms reduce labor demand as financing constraints become more severe in response to adverse shocks, lowering labor income and thereby aggregate demand. We empirically test this channel with a “micro-to-macro” approach based off the universe of US public firms. We first show that firms that ex ante appear to be relatively financially constrained contract employment more after a monetary tightening. We then assess the aggregate implications of this employment channel through a regional design. We construct measures of a given county’s exposure to public firms with differential financial constraints, and document that more exposed counties exhibit stronger employment declines following contractionary monetary shocks. Preliminary evidence suggests that within-county spillovers of constrained firms to the regional labor market are concentrated in non-tradable establishments, suggesting that interactions between aggregate demand and financial amplification through employment may be operative.